You can outgrow vanilla Postgres without abandoning Postgres

For many data aficionados, Postgres is the way to store and manage relational data. It’s efficient, it’s straightforward, and it plays nice with other tools. But even Postgres has its limits.

When you’re working with a relentless stream of live data, you may catch Postgres chugging along on the struggle bus: slower queries, more maintenance requirements, and enough database upkeep to make your autovacuum beg for a pit stop.

Developers are increasingly turning to Postgres as a foundation for AI applications, thanks in part to its flexibility and extensive ecosystem. But you might hit its limits even faster as you add AI agents to your pipeline. Agentic workflows often increase database activity. You’ll likely see more frequent database requests and a need to retain more data over time.

As your tables and indexes grow, keeping queries fast may require more behind-the-scenes attention. Vanilla Postgres may have handled your time-series data just fine at first; that is, until keeping Postgres running becomes a job of its own.

Join the conversation: On October 21, we’ll sit down with Matty Stratton, Head of Developer Advocacy and Docs at Tiger Data, to discuss how scale stretches vanilla Postgres to its limits and how you can extend it with TimescaleDB. He’ll walk through a live demo of TimescaleDB and point out which Postgres pain points emerge as data volume and velocity increase.

REGISTER NOW FOR THIS WEBINAR

What's the biggest thing standing between you and scaling Postgres for time-series data today? *

Please select I don't know where my limits are yet I know where it breaks, just not what to do about it I'm actively evaluating a switch Just here to learn

Email *

First Name *

Last Name *

Job Role *

Please select AI Researcher / Research Scientist Architect Business Development/Marketing/Sales Community Manager / Developer Advocate Data Analyst / Business Intelligence Analyst Data Engineer Data Scientist Developer / Software Engineer DevOps Engineer Educator / Instructor Enthusiast/Hobbyist Founder / Entrepreneur / Investor / VC IT management, including CIO/CISO/CTO/CDO Machine Learning Engineer MLOps Engineer / Infrastructure Engineer Product Manager Security / Privacy Professional Statistician / Quantitative Analyst Student SysAdmin/Operations/SRE Technical Writer UX / UI Designer / Data Visualization Specialist Job Level *

Please select C-Level Founder/Owner VP/Director Manager/Supervisor Mid Level or Senior Individual Contributor Entry Level or Junior Individual Contributor Freelancer/Contractor Educator (Teacher, Instructor, Professor) Student/Intern Other N/A Industry *

Please select Advertising/Marketing Aerospace/Aviation Agriculture Automotive Biotech/Pharmaceutical Business Services (accounting, consulting, etc.) Computers/Information Technology Construction Education Facilities/Service Industry Finance/Financial Services (banking, insurance, etc.) Government Healthcare Human Resources Legal Life sciences (biotech, pharmaceuticals, etc.) Manufacturing Media Non-profit Real Estate Retail/Consumer Goods Telecommunications Transportation/Logistics Travel/Hospitality/Entertainment Utility/Energy Organization *

Country *

Please select United States Canada United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Congo (Democratic Republic) Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (North) Korea (South) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe State *

Phone Number

Register By registering, you consent to The New Stack’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and to receiving email communication from The New Stack and our event partner. You may opt out at any time.

You have successfully registered for the webinar.

At first, you might dedicate more resources to your Postgres system. You could optimize your queries or partition your data into smaller tables. Or you could tune up autovacuum and regularly rebuild bloated indexes. You might even purchase more expensive hardware for your system. At some point though, you’ll have to ask yourself, “How much engineering effort do I really want to devote to my current setup?”

Next, you may be tempted to abandon Postgres altogether to avoid so many engineering struggles. Switching to a specialized system might feel inevitable and even satisfying at first, but it can lead to potentially expensive migration work.

You’ll have a new database to learn, which may mean you and your team need to learn a new query language or API. You may need to maintain duplicate data in both Postgres and the new setup for a while as you validate things. As daunting as that feels, keeping Postgres starts to look more appealing.

Instead of ripping everything out, you can change how Postgres handles your data. And there’s more than one way to rethink your Postgres architecture. For example, newer approaches such as Databricks Lakebase separate compute from storage.

This lets each piece scale independently while keeping Postgres at the core. Or if you’re feeling the pressure of large-scale time-series workloads, you can extend Postgres itself with TimescaleDB from Tiger Data. It leverages hypertables, columnar compression, and continuous aggregates to change how Postgres stores, queries, and summarizes demanding volumes of time-series data.

In this October 21 webinar, you’ll learn how vanilla Postgres handles high ingestion rates and how TimescaleDB offers an alternative to a costly database migration.

Matty Stratton of Tiger Data joins us live in “Postgres at Scale: What Breaks (and What Doesn’t) When Live Data Grows.” He’ll demonstrate TimescaleDB and walk through how to identify where your Postgres system is starting to strain, what tuning can still solve, and when it might be time to consider a different approach.

Worried your Postgres system is showing signs of wear and tear? Register now to learn what to watch for and what to do when Postgres starts to struggle.

The post You can outgrow vanilla Postgres without abandoning Postgres appeared first on The New Stack.